Have you ever watched a football game where team “A” is destroying team “B” and late in the 4th quarter, with time running out, team “A” drives down the field and gets inside the opponents 5 yard line and there is still a little time left in the game. What does team “A” do? If it is a team coached by Nick Saban then they call time out and try and get one more touchdown but if team “A” is coached by someone else then they run out the clock and the quarterback ‘takes a knee’ (kneeling to signal the play over but allowing the clock to run out).
It looks like this:
Some people think taking a knee is wrong, especially in the NFL, and that you should play hard until time runs out because it is up to the other team to stop you. While I agree with that somewhat, I feel that taking a knee at the end of the game is even more demoralizing to the losing team than if you tried to run up the score with another touchdown. The message the winning team is sending to the losing team is that the level of competition was so lopsided that the winning team is taking pity on the losing team. The winning team is telling the losing team (and their fans) that they could’ve scored again but took sympathy on the other team because they were beneath their level.
That is exactly what Romney did to Obama during the 3rd debate this week. Romney knew the Benghazi debacle would continue to fester and he didn’t need to attack Obama on this. By Romney allowing those who still consider themselves journalists (like the Reuters article) to do the heavy lifting on Benghazi-gate, Romney sent the message that he knows victory is certain and instead of running up the score, he decided to show pity on Obama.
Obama was left looking petulant and trying to score points with zingers that later turned into duds while Romney appeared presidential and was seen as the adult at the table offering solutions to problems.
Do you need proof that Romney should be confident of victory? Look no further than this recent poll in the swing state of Ohio.
This poll has Obama leading Romney in Ohio 49% to 44% but, as always with these polls, we need to dive deeper.
Let’s first take a look at the overall results of this poll:
You’ll see from the partisanship columns that those who identify with Democrats are 37% (273/742) and those who identify with Republican are 28% (206/742) so this poll has a D+9 sampling bias. Ohio is a true swing state and if you think the characteristic of a swing state is a 9 percentage point advantage to one party then you are sadly mistaken. Obama won the 2008 presidential election in Ohio by only 4.5 percentage points and that was with a totally different political climate than we have in 2012. To think that the D/R advantage in Ohio would be twice what it was in 2008 is wishful thinking for Leftists.
Another part of the Time poll shows independents moving overwhelmingly in favor of Romney.
Ohio Independents are favoring Romney over Obama 35% to 23% and this is huge in a swing state.
Romney has to be privy to internal polls that show this same swing in Ohio and this is my guess as to why Romney was so confident in the 3rd debate and backed off on attacking Obama on Benghazi.
Without Ohio, Obama doesn’t have a chance to win a 2nd term and if you look deeply into this latest poll you can understand why Romney took a knee.
Two more weeks and this Obama nightmare will be over.