Reaction From 2nd Debate

Obama did so horrible in the first debate that he had nowhere to go but up and he did improve so at worst I would rate this debate as a push.  But on the issue that is most important to voters, the economy, Romney nailed it every time tonight.  Obama kept promising how he was going to move us forward or something and Romney reminded people that Obama has had 4 years and we have a pitiful recovery from a deep recession.

The best part of the debate happened after a response to a question about what Obama has done to earn 4 more years and read the transcript below for the question and Romney’s rebuttal to Obama’s rhetoric.  The video clip of this portion should be run in advertisements from now until November 6th!

QUESTION: Mr. President, I voted for you in 2008. What have you done or accomplished to earn my vote in 2012? I’m not that optimistic as I was in 2012. Most things I need for everyday living are very expensive.

ROMNEY: I think you know better. I think you know that these last four years haven’t been so good as the president just described and that you don’t feel like your confident that the next four years are going to be much better either.

I can tell you that if you were to elect President Obama, you know what you’re going to get. You’re going to get a repeat of the last four years. We just can’t afford four more years like the last four years.

He said that by now we’d have unemployment at 5.4 percent. The difference between where it is and 5.4 percent is 9 million Americans without work.

I wasn’t the one that said 5.4 percent. This was the president’s plan. Didn’t get there.

He said he would have by now put forward a plan to reform Medicare and Social Security, because he pointed out they’re on the road to bankruptcy. He would reform them. He’d get that done. He hasn’t even made a proposal on either one.

He said in his first year he’d put out an immigration plan that would deal with our immigration challenges. Didn’t even file it.

This is a president who has not been able to do what he said he’d do. He said that he’d cut in half the deficit. He hasn’t done that either. In fact, he doubled it. He said that by now middle-income families would have a reduction in their health insurance premiums by $2,500 a year. It’s gone up by $2,500 a year. And if Obamacare is passed, or implemented — it’s already been passed — if it’s implemented fully, it’ll be another $2,500 on top.

The middle class is getting crushed under the policies of a president who has not understood what it takes to get the economy working again. He keeps saying, “Look, I’ve created 5 million jobs.” That’s after losing 5 million jobs. The entire record is such that the unemployment has not been reduced in this country. The unemployment, the number of people who are still looking for work, is still 23 million Americans.

There are more people in poverty, one out of six people in poverty.

How about food stamps? When he took office, 32 million people were on food stamps. Today, 47 million people are on food stamps. How about the growth of the economy? It’s growing more slowly this year than last year, and more slowly last year than the year before.

The president wants to do well. I understand. But the policies he’s put in place from Obamacare to Dodd-Frank to his tax policies to his regulatory policies, these policies combined have not let this economy take off and grow like it could have.

You might say, “Well, you got an example of one that worked better?” Yeah, in the Reagan recession where unemployment hit 10.8 percent, between that period — the end of that recession and the equivalent of time to today, Ronald Reagan’s recovery created twice as many jobs as this president’s recovery. Five million jobs doesn’t even keep up with our population growth. And the only reason the unemployment rate seems a little lower today is because of all the people that have dropped out of the workforce.

The president has tried, but his policies haven’t worked. He’s great as a — as a — as a speaker and describing his plans and his vision. That’s wonderful, except we have a record to look at. And that record shows he just hasn’t been able to cut the deficit, to put in place reforms for Medicare and Social Security to preserve them, to get us the rising incomes we need. Median income is down $4,300 a family and 23 million Americans out of work. That’s what this election is about. It’s about who can get the middle class in this country a bright and prosperous future and assure our kids the kind of hope and optimism they deserve.

The only part of the debate where I felt Romney made a severe stumble was on the last part of his response to the Benghazi question.

ROMNEY: I want to make sure we get that for the record because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

Obama actually did use the phrase “act of terror” to describe the Benghazi attacks during his statements in the Rose garden the day after.  It came in paragraph 10 of the transcript:

“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.”

It should also be noted that from paragraph 4 of the transcript from the Rose Garden, Obama made reference to the video.

“Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.”

So Romney got that detail wrong and I think he should have focused on Team Obama pushing the video for days after the attack, even though they knew it was a planned terror attack.  He’ll have to walk this back over the coming days and refocus the discussion on what actually happened.  This is a softball that should be hit out of the park and Romney can’t afford another misstep on such a damaging issue for Obama.

It was a push and the debate performances won’t move the needle on the polls in favor of Obama.  We have one more to go and as long as Romney delivers like he did tonight, Obama will not be able to recover from his disastrous performance in the first debate.

This entry was posted in politics. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Reaction From 2nd Debate

  1. Steve says:

    Ha! I don’t know what debate you watched. Romney looked and sounded like a used car salesman. Desperate and hopelessly lost.

  2. blaine says:

    For people concerned about the economy and the last 4 years, Romney articulated a plan and demonstrated the experience necessary to reassure voters who are looking for a better option than a repeat of the last 4 years.

    Romney won on the issue of the economy tonight. The snap polls confirmed this after both debates.

    The problem Romney had is that many people thought he was a fat cat robber barren, who only cared about other rich fat cats because the Obama campaign spent hundreds of millions of dollars of negative adds defining Romney this way. Usually negative adds work.

    However, when 70 million people actually had an extended look at Romney in the first debate, a large number of them, including women, liked what they saw and heard. Many came to the conclusion that this is a good man with a proven history of success and that maybe there is a good chance he could be a better president than the one we have now. That is why the polls have swung so fast in favor of Romney.

    Romney’s flub on Benghazi might actually work in his favor as Candy Crowley has now made an extraordinary step of back tracking and admitting Romney was right on the issue. This will keep this story alive in the news cycle. The truth about what happened and why Obama was peddling a story he knew or should have know was false, is not going to help his chances of getting reelected.

    • I agree with you, Blaine.

      It’s like missing a sack, but then getting a “pick 6” for the touchdown. By her astounding interference into the debate itself, Crowley has inadvertently guaranteed that Benghazi, the timeline, and the whole “did-he-or-didn’t-he-call-it-terrorism” discussion will be in the news today, and tomorrow, …and maybe even longer.
      This is NOT a PLUS for Obama.

      And, it will also come up a day or two prior to the NEXT debate, especially since that is on foreign policy exclusively.

      This debate could eventually end up being a draw, but I think this is a small wound that gets infected for Obama…..
      It’s going to fester, not heal.

  3. cosmoscon says:

    Blaine and JTR are all over this. Benghazi will continue to be Obama’s albatross. Crowley thought she was helping Obama when she in-line fact checked but now her back stroking will give further ammunition to Romney in the final debate. Oh, I think the final debate is on foreign policy!!!

    • blaine says:

      The only thing I worry about is that 50 million people saw Romney’s flub and a large number of them, especially undecideds, will never see the follow-up corrections.

      Early voting is going on now and Ohio could be decided by less than 1% either way.

      If Obama wins, history may point to the moment Romney let Obama off the hook for deliberate dissembling.

      There is a pattern of this administration hiding facts and promoting false cover stories for political advantage: Fast and Furious and Benghazi.

      Romney swung and missed on both issues last night. He missed a golden opportunity to confront a president who promised the most transparent administration ever. Obama has failed to come clean with 2 indefensible scandals where American citizens were murdered as a direct result of Obama’s administration to failure to act in a way to protect them.

      At least with Watergate, no Americans ended up murdered. The same can not be said for Fast and Furious and Benghazi. Obama needs to go.

      I find Obama’s tactics deeply offensive and his hypocrisy breath taking. This is a man who was vociferous in his politically correct opposition to water boarding a terrorist who was responsible for planning 9/11 but then Obama has no problem ordering drone strikes on terrorists (some US citizens) where innocent women and children become collateral damage.

  4. With the final presidential debate focused on foreign policy just days away, the president’s opponents will undoubtedly continue to raise questions on Libya. It remains to be seen if he will have answers on Monday night.

  5. Romney nailed it. The Benghazi morass has it’s own wheels no matter what Romney said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s